Wright v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government 2
NORMAN WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT; LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officers in the Employ of Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government; TRAVIS HATCHELL, Defendants-Appellees.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
06a0551n.06; 191 Fed. Appx. 412; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19722; 2006 FED App. 0551N (6th Cir.)
August 2, 2006, Filed
PRIOR HISTORY: ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY.
Wright v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Gov’t, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12176 (W.D. Ky., June 16, 2005)
COUNSEL: For NORMAN WRIGHT, Plaintiff – Appellant: James M. Bolus, Jr , Michael A. Augustus , Bolus & Ragland, Louisville, KY.
For LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officers in the Employ of Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, TRAVIS HATCHELL, Defendant – Appellee: I.G. Spencer, Jr. , Kunga Njuguna, Jefferson County Attorney’s Office, Louisville, KY.
JUDGES: BEFORE: MARTIN and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; JORDAN, District Judge. *
* The Honorable R. Leon Jordan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
OPINION BY: LEON JORDAN
[*412] LEON JORDAN, District Judge. Norman Wright appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants. After reviewing [**2] the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. The district court committed no reversible error. Its judgment is therefore AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in its summary judgment memorandum opinion.